With the SCOTUS hearing augments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization yesterday the sabers are rattling on both sides of the fence on this issue. This case was so important that we had to add a second round of Pro-Life News this week.

From American Family News


Read the following excerpt of Justice Sotomayor questioning of Scott G. Stewart, Solicitor General, Jackson, Mississippi; How is your interest anything but a religious view? The issue of when life begins has been hotly debated by philosophers since the beginning of time. It’s still debated in religions. So, when you say this is the only right that takes away from the state the ability to protect a life, that’s a religious view, isn’t it –

Is she seriously saying that protecting life is a “religious only” point of view and if one is not “religious” they would have no interest in the protection of life? It appears so.

Maybe it is just me, but I think she forgot something very important here while the Constitution says nothing about Abortion is does speak about defending life and States rights:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.… 

nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Justice Clarence Thomas Makes It Clear There’s No Right to Abortion in the Constitution

Justice Amy Coney Barrett Destroys Pro-Abortion Argument That Abortion Bans Force Women to be Pregnant

Sonia Sotomayor Claims Fetal Pain is Not Proof Unborn Children are Human Beings

Justice Brett Kavanaugh: Just Because Roe is Precedent Doesn’t Mean it Can’t be Overturned

A Supreme Case for Lives

Five takeaways from oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

The End of Roe? Five Things to Listen for During the Dobbs Oral Argument

Supreme Court hears arguments on Mississippi abortion law

Abortion is about our core national values

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.